S t r i p p e r : ย C o n f e s s i o n s ย o f ย a ย L a n d ย S u r v e y o r
B y ย P e a n ย C h e n e y i n g ย P L S
(Originally published in Gulf Coast Surveyor, September 2011 under the column "Chain!")
PART 2
STRIP NAKED
Joe called saying he wanted a Landย Survey to define a strip of land he wasย occupying next to the recorded lot heย owned that he wanted to purchaseย from his adjoiner. He said he had readย some positive reports about our firmย and that is why he was contacting us.ย A current tax mosaic was pulled showingย the lot in question along with theย current tax report for his lot and thenย sent along with a proposal with a priceย and time frame for an Investigativeย Survey that would we felt would suitย is needs. I explained to Joe in writingย and over the phone how I thought theย process should proceed regardingย purchasing the strip. I advised him toย contact a lawyer and provided phoneย numbers for a few of them. I also explainedย that it may not be necessary toย hire a lawyer and that I could prepareย and file this paperwork for him if he soย desired.
The next day the proposal was sentย back signed so we started work on thisย project. The initial visit to the siteย showed Joe appeared to be occupyingย about 4โ of land out of the adjoiningย lot. The current tax mosaic, the currentย tax report, the vesting Deed into Joeย from 1986 all described just the lotย only. There seemed to be somethingย wrong because improvements thatย were occupying the 4โ strip adjoiningย Joeโs lot were reported to appear to beย in excess of 30 years in age.
The vesting Deed was pulled for theย adjoiner, despite the fact that the currentย tax mosaic and the current taxย report showed the adjoiner owning theย entire lot. The adjoining vesting Deedย dating to 1998 was for the entire lot,ย save and except the north 4โ (the stripย in question). A search was then madeย of the chain of title going back to theย original owners of either lot. It turnedย out the adjoinerโs predecessor in titleย had conveyed Joeโs predecessor in titleย the 4โ strip in 1976. Joeโs land hadย changed hands 6 times since then andย the 4โ strip had never been mentionedย in any of those conveyances. Landย Survey after Land Survey, Title Policyย after Title Policy had failed to identifyย this problem. The Land Survey performedย for Joeโs closing in 1986 justย showed the fence and other improvementsย 4โ over the boundary. The adjoinerโsย property had changed hands 3ย times since 1976 and each descriptionย was for the lot save and except the 4โย strip, however the tax reports and taxย mosaic had never changed. Apparentlyย the original transaction for the 4โ stripย had never been reported to the Taxย Assessor Collectors Office and the handlersย of the subsequent transactions onย the adjoining property had failed toย report the absence of the 4โ strip toย them as well.
A Land Survey was prepared with anย attached Surveyorโs report and Joe wasย contacted. We explained the situation toย him in writing and in person so heย would fully understand the results.ย What we had found indicated a conditionย whereby the adjoiner had beenย paying taxes on a 4โ strip they did notย own since 1976. Joe was in possessionย of the 4โ strip of land that he had no titleย to and what was worse was none of hisย predecessors in title had title to the 4โย strip since the original buyer of it conveyedย the lot in 1978. Neither Joe norย any of his predecessors in title had everย paid taxes on the 4โ strip.
I advised Joe on various ways I thoughtย the problem could be eliminated forย little or no money and the drawbacksย and difficulties that each cure mightย entail. I advised Joe to seek the councilย of a lawyer and gave him some phoneย numbers of some lawyers I know who had experience with this type of specific problem.ย
Joe was very upset and said that heย was going to sue the Title Insuranceย Company, the Land Surveyor who didย his survey in 1986 and his lender. I toldย him this may not be possible in some ofย those cases and told him he shouldย consult a lawyer.
I urged him to consider the alternativesย I had outlined for fixing this problemย for relatively little money and aggravationย compared to a lawsuit. Joe said he would contact me.
Phone messages to Joe have goneย unanswered and we have not heardย from him for months now. I hope forย his own sake he calls back sometimeย soon.
PART 3 "STRIP SEARCH" to come....
Thoughts