Show us why the public should always call a land surveyor

Where are you surveying?

 

Introduction

 

          The data were used for this comparison were taken from the measurement lines of the project. Comparison was made for an even and uneven terrain, as the results would be as objective as possible.

 

Comparison heights for even terrain

            Comparison heights for even terrain was based on a sample of 145 points.  For each point were measured by X, Y and Z coordinates with GPS. After that,  X and Y coordinates are transformed from the coordinate system of the state to the WGS 84, and then it was done converting .shp file to .kml file, so that the measured points could be seen on GoogleEarth. For each point is stored attribute "measured height", which is shown with the corresponding point Figure 1 or on an interactive map http://milanbozic.weebly.com/poredjenje-visina-ravnomjeran-teren.html.

Figure 1: Sample points for even terrain

 

            Maximum height measured with GPS is 128.73 meters (point number 135), and maximum height from GoogleEarth is 127 meters (point number 134, 137, 138).

 

            Minimum height measured with GPS is 114.56 meters (point number 1), and minimum height from GoogleEarth is 111 meters (point number 1).

 

            The difference between the maximum and minimum height measured with GPS is 14.17 meters, and the difference between the maximum and minimum height from GoogleEarth is 16 meters.

 

            The maximum deviation is 4.18 meters at the point number 129, and the minimum deviation is 0.00 meters at the point number 83.

 

            Figure 2 shows a graph of the heights measured with GPS and heights from GoogleEarth, for even terrain. The blue line represents the shape of the field, obtained from the heights measured with GPS and the red line represents the shape of the field, obtained from the height from GoogleEarth.

Figure 2: Heights chart for even terrain

Comparison  of  heights for uneven terrain

            Comparison of height for uneven terrain was done in the same way as for an even terrain, only in this case the comparison was carried out on a sample of 57 points.

In Figure 3 are shown the points that were used for comparing height for uneven terrain, points also can be seen on the interactive map http://milanbozic.weebly.com/poredjenje-visina-neravnomjeran-teren.html.

Figure 3: Sample points for uneven terrain

 

Maximum height measured with GPS is 463 meters (point number 48), and maximum height from GoogleEarth is 456 meters (point number 55, 56, 57).

 

            Minimum height measured with GPS is 387.35 meters (point number 1), and minimum height from GoogleEarth is 379 meters (point number 1).

 

            The difference between the maximum and minimum height measured with GPS is 76.65 meters, and the difference between the maximum and minimum height from GoogleEarth is 77 meters.

 

            The maximum deviation is 11.20 meters at the point number 27, and the minimum deviation is 0.06 meters at the point number 51.

 

            Figure 4 shows a graph of the heights measured with GPS and heights from GoogleEarth, for uneven terrain. The blue line represents the shape of the field, obtained from the heights measured with GPS and the red line represents the shape of the field, obtained from the height from GoogleEarth.

 

Figure 2: Heights chart for uneven terrain

 

Conclusion

            Based on previously published data and analysis can be concluded that the data from GoogleEarth can only be used for rough planning, or for the purpose of conceptual design.

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Land Surveyors United - Global Surveying Community to add thoughts!

Join Land Surveyors United - Global Surveying Community

Thoughts

  • Height measurements was performed using RTK method, and I used a geoid model.

  • Land Surveyor

    Nice...

    I echo the comments already posted. Thanks for taking the time to share the data.

  • Just curious bro when processing the GPS observations (i guess static) did u use a geoid model or the heights are purely ellipsoidal?

  • Land Surveyor

    Milan,

    Well done!  I was captured by the prose and graphs.  I hope as many laymen as land surveyors read this.

    As a professional, I could predict the conclusion before I read anything, but I see that the you proceeded very logically from premise to conclusion.  That is a sign of a well trained thinker, or at minimum, a naturally and instinctively talented writer and presenter.

    -Scott

  • nice test dear 

    you can use google earth level just to have an idea .

    and i prefer to use civil 3d to convert   between coordinate  system and to import the contour lines from civil 3d  

  • Land Surveyor

    Wonderful and thoughtful analysis. I get so tired of telling people (including those who should know better) that the integrity of this type of data has limits. Thank you for breaking it down so well.

This reply was deleted.

Log into community to no longer see ads

Land Surveying Guides

Our Blog Sitemap

 
 

Explore Surveying Locally

USA Surveying Forums
Asia Surveying Forums
Africa Surveying Forums
Middle East Surveying Forums
European Surveying Forums
South American Surveying Forums
Oceania Surveying Forums
Surveying Equipment Support Forums
Search Survey Photos
Add Posts, Surveying Photos, Videos and Articles to the Surveyor Community
Add Stuff to Community

 


 
 
 

 

 

Latest in Surveyor Community

Dave Lovell, Director at CMS Surveyors via GeoRadio- All Land Surveyor Podcasts in One

We’re not just surveyors, we add a lot of value in a lot of different ways.

Join two old surfies talking about the ocean, sharks, the love of the water and surveying..

Born and Bred on the North Shore of Sydney, Dave Lovell, our…

3 hours ago
Bernardo Niati and oscar solomon joined Land Surveyors United - Global Surveying Community
Land Surveyor Land Surveyor
18 hours ago
christopher lucas posted a blog post
The Collapse of South Fork Dam and its Impact on Surveying: Introduction and Background
Historical Setting and Construction Details
In the mid-19th century, the burgeoning industrial landscape of America necessitated expansive infrastructure…
20 hours ago
Richard Pettey posted a video
This video provides an introduction to understanding topographic maps.  Read the article here:  Topographic Mapping Defining Topographic Maps and Their Purpose
23 hours ago
Richard Pettey posted a video
LiDAR processing has been a hot topic, so our team has created a simple workflow with our partners at GreenValley. In this 60-minute webinar replay, we go through the process of strip alignment, removing outliers, classification, accuracy…
23 hours ago
Richard Pettey published an article
Topographic Mapping: Capturing Detailed Terrain DataAs an experienced land surveyor, I've spent years mastering the art and science of topographic mapping. It's a crucial skill that allows us to capture detailed terrain data and create maps that…
yesterday
christopher lucas posted a blog post
The Rotating Laser Level: Revolutionizing Precision in Land Surveying

In the fast-paced, evolving landscape of land surveying, the introduction of the rotating laser level marked a paradigm shift in how professionals approach the measurement and…
yesterday
Episode 215 - Selbys & GeoMax Positioning w/Bryce Scala via GeoRadio- All Land Surveyor Podcasts in One

Well this was fun! The guys were joined this week by Bryce Scala, Manager at Selbys, Montana’s premier provider of Architectural, Engineering, and Construction supplies and services. Bryce has been with Selbys for over 27 years! Selbys is also an…

yesterday
More…