Analyse Traverse example

Why is "traverse 3" a good solution and "traverse 1" not? What is the difference in accuracy and  reliability?


Following examples are calculated with BestNetwork.

Traverse is a method to establish control networks. Traverse networks involve placing survey stations along a line and then using the previously surveyed points with known coordinates as a base for observing the next point.

Traverse 3 explained: 

- 2 new points with unknown coordinates are marked in red (points 4, 5). 

- Existing points with known coordinates are marked in green (points 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 ,8).

- Station on point 1 with observations (orange lines) to point 2, 3 and 4

- Station on point 4 with observations to point 1 and 5

- Station on point 5 with observations to point 4 and 6

- Station on point 6 with observations to point 7,8 and 5  

Traverse 1 explained:

- 2 new points with unknown coordinates are marked in red (points 4, 5).

- Existing points with known coordinates are marked in green (points 1, 2, 3).

- Station on point 1 with observations (orange lines) to point 2,3 and 4

- Station on point 4 with observations to point 1 and 5

Most critical point is number 5. Let's see the numerical result of traverse 1.

Accuracy (blue error ellipse in map):

Standard deviation in x is large. (notice that standard deviation of known points is set to 35mm)

Reliability (yellow line in map):

The report shows that the coordinates of point number 5 are not reliable. It is defined through the observation from station 4 and not controlled through any other measurements. A false observation from station 1 to target number 4 can cause an infinite wrong position of point 5 (999999 = infinite) 

Add station 5 to traverse 1. What result can we expect whit this additional effort?

 

Traverse 2 explained:

- 2 new points with unknown coordinates are marked in red (points 4, 5).

- Green points are existing points with known coordinates (points 1, 2, 3, 6).

- Station on point 1 with observations (orange lines) to point 2, 3 and 4

- Station on point 4 with observations to point 1 and 5

- Station on point 5 with observations to point 4 and 6

Accuracy (blue error ellipse in map):

Standard deviation in x is quite good with 26 mm. (notice that standard deviation of known points is set to 35mm)

Reliability (yellow line in map):

The report shows that the coordinates of point number 5 are not reliable. A false observation (or in this case wrong angle) from station 5 to target number 6 can cause a  position error of 270 mm.

Finally see the result of traverse 3. It takes a bit more time to measure all 4 stations. Is this effort worth it? 

Accuracy (blue error ellipse in map):

Standard deviation in x is good with 16 mm. (notice that standard deviation of known points is set to 35mm)

Reliability (yellow line in map):

The report shows that the coordinates of point number 5 are reliable. A false observation (or in this case false angle) from station 5 to target number 6 can cause a  position error of 93 mm.

 

Decide yourself!

- Traverse 1 is clearly a bad solution as the resulting coordinates of point 5 are not controlled in any way.

- Traverse 2 might be an option.There is some control and depending on the situation this may or may not be enough.

- Traverse 3 results are good in terms of accuracy and reliability of point 5 coordinates but it takes time to measure all 4 stations.


Check your own network design with BestNetwork.



Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community to add thoughts!

Join Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community

Log into community to no longer see ads

Land Surveying Guides

Our Blog Sitemap

 
 

Explore Surveying Locally

USA Surveying Forums
Asia Surveying Forums
Africa Surveying Forums
Middle East Surveying Forums
European Surveying Forums
South American Surveying Forums
Oceania Surveying Forums
Surveying Equipment Support Forums
Search Survey Photos
Add Posts, Surveying Photos, Videos and Articles to the Surveyor Community
Add Stuff to Community

 


 
 
 

 

 

Latest in Surveyor Community

christopher lucas published an article
The Shift to the Desk — How We Got Here
There was a time—not long ago—when the only way to become a surveyor was to spend years in the field. You learned by sweating through misclosures, dragging chains through briars, watching sun angles change…
yesterday
The surveyor hub for Continuing Education was featured
Monday
Justin Farrow posted a video
Oftentimes the boundary surveying process isn't entirely clear to property owners. How are measurements taken? What equipment is used? How do you know you're getting an accurate survey? The land surveying experts at Chastain & Associates, P.C., Mark…
Monday
Brady Thorne, Jeffrey Underwood and Mary Harmon joined Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community
Student Surveyor Land Surveyor Land Surveyor
Monday
Justin Farrow posted a video
📐 Welcome to our comprehensive guide on Profile and Cross-Sectional Leveling in Surveying! 🌐 In this practical surveying tutorial, we'll take you through the essential concepts and techniques for creating accurate profiles and cross-sections of…
Monday
2025 Pacific Rim Geospatial Conference - Day 2 (Part 1) via GeoRadio- All Land Surveyor Podcasts in One

Check out these highlights from Day 2 of this year's awesome event!!!

00:30 Alika Garo, Project Surveyor at Sam O. Hirota, Inc.

10:02 Cliff Yim, Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Hawaii

20:38 Joey Furlett, Realtor-Broker…

Monday
2025 Pacific Rim Geospatial Conference - Day 1 via GeoRadio- All Land Surveyor Podcasts in One

Check out these highlights from Day 1 of this year's awesome event!!!

01:00 - Victor Rasgado, Senior Surveyor at Stantec Consulting Services

12:09 - Heath Huovinen, Land Surveyor at The Independent Hawaii Surveyors   

27:05 -…

Mar 27
Kiel Bailey is now a member of Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community
Mar 27
More…