Analyse Traverse example

Why is "traverse 3" a good solution and "traverse 1" not? What is the difference in accuracy and  reliability?


Following examples are calculated with BestNetwork.

Traverse is a method to establish control networks. Traverse networks involve placing survey stations along a line and then using the previously surveyed points with known coordinates as a base for observing the next point.

Traverse 3 explained: 

- 2 new points with unknown coordinates are marked in red (points 4, 5). 

- Existing points with known coordinates are marked in green (points 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 ,8).

- Station on point 1 with observations (orange lines) to point 2, 3 and 4

- Station on point 4 with observations to point 1 and 5

- Station on point 5 with observations to point 4 and 6

- Station on point 6 with observations to point 7,8 and 5  

Traverse 1 explained:

- 2 new points with unknown coordinates are marked in red (points 4, 5).

- Existing points with known coordinates are marked in green (points 1, 2, 3).

- Station on point 1 with observations (orange lines) to point 2,3 and 4

- Station on point 4 with observations to point 1 and 5

Most critical point is number 5. Let's see the numerical result of traverse 1.

Accuracy (blue error ellipse in map):

Standard deviation in x is large. (notice that standard deviation of known points is set to 35mm)

Reliability (yellow line in map):

The report shows that the coordinates of point number 5 are not reliable. It is defined through the observation from station 4 and not controlled through any other measurements. A false observation from station 1 to target number 4 can cause an infinite wrong position of point 5 (999999 = infinite) 

Add station 5 to traverse 1. What result can we expect whit this additional effort?

 

Traverse 2 explained:

- 2 new points with unknown coordinates are marked in red (points 4, 5).

- Green points are existing points with known coordinates (points 1, 2, 3, 6).

- Station on point 1 with observations (orange lines) to point 2, 3 and 4

- Station on point 4 with observations to point 1 and 5

- Station on point 5 with observations to point 4 and 6

Accuracy (blue error ellipse in map):

Standard deviation in x is quite good with 26 mm. (notice that standard deviation of known points is set to 35mm)

Reliability (yellow line in map):

The report shows that the coordinates of point number 5 are not reliable. A false observation (or in this case wrong angle) from station 5 to target number 6 can cause a  position error of 270 mm.

Finally see the result of traverse 3. It takes a bit more time to measure all 4 stations. Is this effort worth it? 

Accuracy (blue error ellipse in map):

Standard deviation in x is good with 16 mm. (notice that standard deviation of known points is set to 35mm)

Reliability (yellow line in map):

The report shows that the coordinates of point number 5 are reliable. A false observation (or in this case false angle) from station 5 to target number 6 can cause a  position error of 93 mm.

 

Decide yourself!

- Traverse 1 is clearly a bad solution as the resulting coordinates of point 5 are not controlled in any way.

- Traverse 2 might be an option.There is some control and depending on the situation this may or may not be enough.

- Traverse 3 results are good in terms of accuracy and reliability of point 5 coordinates but it takes time to measure all 4 stations.


Check your own network design with BestNetwork.



Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community to add thoughts!

Join Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community

Log into community to no longer see ads

Land Surveying Guides

Our Blog Sitemap

 
 

Explore Surveying Locally

USA Surveying Forums
Asia Surveying Forums
Africa Surveying Forums
Middle East Surveying Forums
European Surveying Forums
South American Surveying Forums
Oceania Surveying Forums
Surveying Equipment Support Forums
Search Survey Photos
Add Posts, Surveying Photos, Videos and Articles to the Surveyor Community
Add Stuff to Community

 


 
 
 

 

 

Latest in Surveyor Community

Stefan van der Merwe posted a discussion
Good afternoon,I dont know much about the newest equipment, and I hope one of the members would be able to help me. I was a hydrographic surveyor for 2 decades. I also bought my own new Topcon GTS-725 total station in 2004. I always use this…
16 hours ago
Anthony Facchino is now a member of Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community
yesterday
David Drahn posted a discussion in Hawaii Land Surveyors
I've been here 13 years but have been licensed for just 2 (surveying here foar about 10).  Is there a forum (here or ellsewhere) where we share experience in the mechanics of surveying in Hawaii?  I'd certainly use some mentorship in efficiently and…
Tuesday
David Drahn updated their profile
Tuesday
christopher lucas published an article
Earth Day at 55 – A Climate Reckoning
Earth Day has evolved from protest to policy—but the world’s environmental crisis has only intensified.

In 1970, twenty million Americans took to parks, streets, and campuses for the first Earth Day—a…
Tuesday
Week 149: Overview of Outreach 101 & Crew Guides created by the NSPS Workforce Development Committee via GeoRadio- All Land Surveyor Podcasts in One
78 views 3 likes

Channel: Trent Keenan

Join us for a discussion and overview of two valuable resources…
Tuesday
Episode 249 -Sean Gorman & Zephr via GeoRadio- All Land Surveyor Podcasts in One

Apologies for the audio challenges...it was one of those nights!!

In this episode, the Geoholics crew sits down with serial startup whisperer Sean Gorman, co-founder of Zephr.xyz—a company so cutting-edge it probably triangulated this…

Tuesday
Brandon Hartney, Andrew, Stefan van der Merwe and 1 more joined Land Surveyors United - Surveying Education Community
Land Surveyor Land Surveyor Land Surveyor Land Surveyor
Monday
More…