Earth's Largest Land Surveyor Community
When I started my career, I have been attracted by one (of many) question : how accurate is the surface/volume calculations knowing the uncertainties of the points that define these geometrical figures. I really wanted to know in term of standard deviation what would be the "end results".
The solution was to propagate the variances (standard deviation squared) into the functional model (the mathematical formula in short) and to retrieve the results I was looking for.
By taking the formula to determine the surface of a polygon, we have the coordinates of all points.
By differentiating that equation vs point's coordinates, we can assimilate (at the first order) the derivates dx, dy to the standard deviation of course squared. The result was a pretty elegant formulation.
I will attach the development below.
Now having the standard deviation on the surface in function of the point's standard deviations ... we can reverse the approach and start from the customer's perspective.
For a given polygon, knowing the tolerance on the surface would be given ... what would be the standard deviation of the points we have to achieve. That's optimization ! No need to survey more accurately than needed for instance.
We can use the same rigorous approach for volume calculations.
What do you think ? Is that something you are also concerned with ?
Development :
Starting with the surface formula :
Then we can arrange the terms :
And proceed with differentiation :
Which leads to the final expression in term of standard deviation on the surface.
You will recognize that is the sum of the diagonal squared which can be formalized as a "surface" criterion like the GDOP is for GNSS position ! I think it's an elegant result ...
Now the step by step calculation :
This Content Originally Published by a land surveyor to Land Surveyors United Network
Views: 395
Tags:
Communicate ⇣
Hi Joel!
I appreciate your effort to evaluate with the statistics the "quality" of the model ... but IMHO is more important "number" and "location" of the points are describing the model.
I think that in our job (surveying) we rarely have the chance to evaluate a regular solid: more frequently we work with models (DTM)
Few (but also many ...!) badly distributed points (although accurated ...) can not build a good model.
I think a "dense" survey with rtk (centimeter accuracy) data is more than adequate for most of the volume calculations that are required for excavations or quarries.
Your method is very suitable for industrial applications: I'll keep this! Thanks
Where Thousands of Professional Land Surveyors, Students of Surveying and Educators are United through Collaborative Knowledge and Purpose.
Started by shree ram bhandari in Surveying Documents. Last reply by ⚡Survenator⌁ 4 hours ago. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
Started by John J Rodriquez in Surveying Best Practices. Last reply by Donald E Robinson, PLS, CFS yesterday. 16 Replies 1 Favorite
Started by shree ram bhandari in Land Surveying Jobs. Last reply by Billy Brooks on Saturday. 11 Replies 1 Favorite
Started by Jeff Johnstone in Surveying Equipment and Software Talk. Last reply by Jaybird Feb 10. 2 Replies 1 Favorite
Started by Billy Brooks in Surveying Best Practices. Last reply by Billy Brooks Feb 6. 2 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Lalith Senanayake in Surveying Related Links. Last reply by shree ram bhandari Feb 12. 4 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Mohammad Salem in Surveying Equipment and Software Talk. Last reply by ⚡Survenator⌁ Jan 28. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
Started by Ian harvey in Surveying Equipment and Software Talk. Last reply by Ian harvey Jan 31. 3 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Ron Willhoit in Introduce Yourself to the Community. Last reply by ⚡Survenator⌁ Jan 27. 3 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Nitesh Shrestha in Land Surveying Jobs. Last reply by Nitesh Shrestha Jan 21. 3 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Massimo in Surveying Best Practices. Last reply by Maurice Heter on Saturday. 7 Replies 2 Favorites
Started by Chuck Turlington in Geospatial Industry Types. Last reply by Kim Noblitt Jan 17. 6 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Maciej Michalak in Surveying Equipment and Software Talk. Last reply by ⚡Survenator⌁ Jan 8. 2 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Maciej Michalak in Introduce Yourself to the Community. Last reply by ⚡Survenator⌁ Jan 8. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
Started by Carl Strydom in Surveying Field Tips and Tricks. Last reply by WADE DEDOBBELEER Jan 21. 15 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Malik in Surveying Field Tips and Tricks. Last reply by Kevin D. Allen Jan 7. 5 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Maciej Michalak in Surveying Equipment and Software Talk. Last reply by ⚡Survenator⌁ Jan 9. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
Started by Najib Lishaa in Introduce Yourself to the Community. Last reply by Jaybird Jan 4. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
Started by Mthulisi Mloyi in Professional Advice for New Surveyors. Last reply by ⚡Survenator⌁ Jan 4. 2 Replies 0 Favorites
Started by Alyssa Fournier in Surveying Field Tips and Tricks. Last reply by Alyssa Fournier Jan 4. 20 Replies 3 Favorites
Add Surveying Photos
Add Surveying Videos
Add a Discussion
Add a Blog Post or Story
Add a New Hub
Add an Event
Add Worktruck Music
? Find a Surveyor
DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF SKIP FARROW (1953-2015)
Help With Survey Equipment
Surveying Video Categories
Surveying Photo Categories
United States Hub Forums
International Surveyor Hub Forums
Resources for Company Owners
Land Surveyor Social Media
Surveyor Resources Collections
Getting Started & Newsletter
© 2019 © Created by Land Surveyors United
Powered by
Follow Land Surveyors United