Show us why the public should always call a land surveyor

Where are you surveying?


🌐 Show Forums for All Locations
Land Surveyor Community

RTN Vertical Accuracy

Hello,

I am subscribed to the State of Arizona's RTN network. I've inventoried the 55 mountpoints and found varying results. When the reception is good I get reliable information confirmed by existing record data. I've been told that it is not recommended for topo work, the vertical is subject to a shift or
phase which I am researching.

Could someone please explain this shift or share their experiences with RTNs?

Your help would be appreciated.

Thank You,

Paul

You need to be a member of Land Surveyors United - Global Surveying Community to add thoughts!

Join Land Surveyors United - Global Surveying Community

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • GPS/GLONASS (GNSS) satellites are rarely positioned directly overhead, but always on your horizon.  Your will get good horizontal readings because the geometry of the angles are far apart.  You will always get poor vertical readings because the satellites are not at a large angle of incidence to your location.

    Taking a vertical reading with a GNSS is like trying to calculate a location 50 meters away by doing a distance-distance calculation from 2 points that are only 2 meters apart.  Your error ellipse is huge because the angles intersect only a few degrees apart and you have no redundancy.  It is a miracle that you can actually get something within a few centimeters period.

    GNSS should never be used to get anything but a topographic elevation.

    • Land Surveyor

      Above 50 degrees of Latitude you probably encounter the situations you listed above.

      Here in Texas I've taken Leica SmartNet measurements on points with at least 2 hours of Static occupation with results with in 0.10' (3 cm) x,y & z. Setting up on these GNSS static points and measuring between them with my Leica Robot normally yields +/-0.02' x & y and +/- 0.05 in z (elev). 

      NGS has been using GNSS for the last decade for Height Modernization projects down here in the lower 48. 

      http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/heightmod/

      Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has released the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 2013 (CGVD2013), which is now the new reference standard for heights across Canada. This new height reference system is replacing the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1928 (CGVD28), which was adopted officially by an Order in Council in 1935.

      https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/geomatics/geodetic-reference...

      • The 3cm you quote above is about what you can expect - not much better, which is what seems to be the issue in this discussion.

  • Land Surveyor
    A company I worked with about two years ago rented a Trimple GPS unit to aid us in a "rush" project in Rahway, NJ. Two Leica units were also being used on the same project. To make a long story short the Trimble units RTK elevations varied consistently by 0.15' to 0.20' when compared to the Leica numbers and NGS published monumentation. The Leica used the New Jersey-Delaware SmartNET and Leica DC software and the Trimble used a Trimble networks do Trimble DC software. We did not investigate it too much further and applied a correction factor after we proved the difference between the two. Naturally the field crew took the initial blame, but I'm pretty sure they were not the problem.

    I don't know if this is the same shift you are experiencing and I'm not sure why we encountered it, but it was real. We also had a smaller difference in the horizontal and it too was consistent.

    Good luck.
    Bill
    • Thanks for your input Bill...this discussion is gaining ground, I appreciate your input and will keep you posted to what I and others may contribute or find...Thanks Again...Paul

  • Land Surveyor

    I'm not sure I understand your situation. If you have 55 mount points, I doubt you are getting a network solution (implied by RTN). More likely you are getting corrections from one CORS within a network. If that is correct, getting different results is not very surprising. Every CORS occupies its own location with the unique environmental conditions of that place resulting in differences unique to that CORS.

    Networking software by using the whole network simultaneously uses data from all the stations to determine and mitigate the idiosyncrasies. Mount points then are usually many fewer, identified by preferred formats rather than individual stations.

    I'm still not sure I completely understood your request, but I hope this helps some.

    JAC

    • You are correct in that this is not a network solutions (RTN) It is a collection of single base solutions.

      Tom

      • Hello Tom, thanks...do you use the AZHMP? If so what have you found? Do you use AZGPS?

        Thanks, Paul

    • Sorry to all...let me clarify....I have 55 mount points or continuous operating stations sending out corrections that I can choose from within the network. I connect to one mountpoint at a time, yes each mountpoint has a data sheet...I inventoried each mountpoint and found varying degrees of reception from my current location....I understand that the longer the base line isn't always an indication of poor reception, there are other factors...Thank you for explaining the differences J.Anthony, it does help.

      My question is rooted in GPS legacy which is why I'm asking. At one time it was understood that collected data shifted globally along a vertical angle or plane...if I had a better handle on it I would be able to explain it better, I apologize....Thank You, Paul

      • Land Surveyor

        After about 4-5 hours of data collection, the geometry of the baseline becomes irrelevant. If performing single base- baselines, after about the same time the length of the baseline becomes almost irrelevant (not counting the ppm of course). 

        Most single baseline processing will give ppm of about 1:1,000,000. Most network based processing will give ppm of about 1:10,000,000. This is primarily because the network can mitigate local errors of any of the individual stations.

        If actually doing RTN (RTK) then measurements should be repeated about an hour or more later for redundancy and conformation of reasult.

        JAC

This reply was deleted.

Answer As your Facebook Page

Global Surveyor Forum

Latest Discussions by Category

How to Utilize Surveyor Forums

How to use Forums
Our forums on Land Surveyors United are here to be used as much for finding help with problems in the field as the are for you to express your opinions on anything that has to do with land surveying in general. Feel free to share anything that is on your mind, as long as it isn't meant to damage another member's reputation. Please keep it clean and help insure that everyone has the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of being part of a community that grows together.

We are committed to allowing freedom of expression for all of our members, and that includes maintaining a safe space for people with opposing views to express themselves. We get posts from all over the country and even the globe, so needless to say, people come with different viewpoints on lad surveying practices and processes. We see this diversity and variety as a real strength-- dialogue and debate are an integral part of the educational process, as well as an important tool in exploring different sides of complex issues.

All Community Hubs inside the community have their own forum for asking specific questions to other surveyors, by location, equipment type, etc.

Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives

Global Forums

Add Your Expertise

🌐 Explore Forums Based on Location

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives