🌐 Show Forums for All Locations
Show the latest social shares
USA Surveying Forums
United States Surveyors
- Arizona
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arkansas
- California
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- New Mexico
- Oklahoma
- Ohio
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- Wyoming
- Wisconsin
- West Virginia
- USA Surveying Events
Asia Surveying Forums
Africa Surveying Forums
Middle East Surveying Forums
European Surveying Forums
South American Surveying Forums
Oceania Surveying Forums
Oceania Land Surveyors
Surveying Equipment Support Forums
Choose Your Equipment Type
Search Survey Photos
Search Surveying Photos by Tag
Add Posts, Surveying Photos, Videos and Articles to the Surveyor Community
Add Stuff to Community
Replies
It is intuitive enough since you used measure rounds. It has been at least 7 years since moving to Access from Survey Controller, but I believe it is pretty much the same between the two programs. Measure rounds gives you the ability to review your measurements and to throw out rounds that introduce higher residuals.
It is the right tool to use even though your job is for rough grade with short shots. Time is money but any supplemental control set should meet a minimum accuracy std. acceptable for the job.
interesting. Thanks.
I've got an S6 and Access on a CU controller. To traverse, I measure forward points using "Measure Rounds" and achieve much tighter results than simply traversing a topo shot.
Do not change the point name of points measured using "Measured Rounds"! If you change the point name all subsequent coordinates and heights reliant on the point will be lost. I learned this the hard way.:(
Good luck.
Shane Dennis
Cairns, Australia