My company(Consultant) transferred me to a new project a 4 TOWERS consisting of 34 floors and linked in pairs from the top. The piles and shoring system works were carried out by 95%. When reviewing the Control Points of the project, I found that they used the Scale Factor in the implementation.

Note that

* Dimensions of the building are 100 * 100 meters.

* Tolerance is 7 cm in pile.  
the question
- Is it possible to complete the building with a Scale Factor?

- Or any one have another solution?

This Content Originally Published by a land surveyor to Land Surveyors United Network

Views: 437

See Your Saved Posts Timeline

☇ Reply to this

Replies to This Discussion

You hold an L.S. License and you can’t answer your own question?! Pathetic!!!

Easy there... 

Dear Singer 

I mentioned in my higher words that this is not my fault and i know how to solve, otherwise should be canceled my License. 

I know it is impossible to use the Scale Factor in the building, but i liked to share this issue with all of us. 

thanks for your reply. 

Kevin Singer, you have an LS and would dare to trash a fellow surveyor because he’s asked his extended community for advice or information? You should be ashamed of yourself sir! Just for future reference that kind of comment or attitude towards a fellow member will not be tolerated.

Dear Anthony Whitlock

Thanks and highly appreciated you.

Mohamad,

A bit more information would be useful - 1) when you say a scale factor was used on the control points, are you referring to the general site survey?  2) When you say 95% do you mean that the piling and shoring work is 95% complete?

With out this information I will say the following - A scale factor is used mostly in larger area or route surveys - think a couple of kilometers or miles.  Once you get to a building layout condition revert back to a scale factor of 1.00000 - remember architects only think in square, level and plumb (I know..don't start)  I've never applied a scale factor to a building before. And I am only speaking about normal conditions - nothing like Burj Khalifa or Ping An towers.

On the tolerance vs. the size of the building, consider this - a 100.00 meter length must be established with a tolerance of +/- 7 cm or 0.07 meters at each end. So your +/- or long and short for the 100 meters is 14 cm or 1 part in 1428.  Normal survey scale factors come into play in the 1 part in 10000 and higher ranges.  So your construction tolerances seems far greater ( read "looser" here ) than any survey related scale factor that you might have on your control points.

Hope this helps and Good Luck,

Kevin

Kev,

Easy there? On me?

I know nothing of your background; nor you, mine.

A wee fair tiny bit of my surveying – background, that is –  is that I have done virtually every bit (type/discipline/genre … pick your flavor) of surveying around this planet for nearly three decades.

I have far, far, far too often witnessed – firsthand – the absolute incompetence and sheer inability of *surveyors* from India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, etc. They are wholly incapable of surveying anything. They exist in the business solely by nepotism – quite typically in its purest form of being religion-based.

Harsh? Without doubt.

As harsh they are, my words as equally true.

Every bit of sincere,

Kevin Singer

Dear Kevin Singer 

i have 14 years experience 9 as a consultant.
you get the main point who did this issue is Pakistan surveyors ( consultant and contractor) and this first time to me to meet them, most of the data requested from them they brought it  wrong.

 

thanks for your reply. 

Mohamed

Dear Kevin D. Allen

1) when you say a scale factor was used on the control points, are you referring to the general site survey? yes 

2) When you say 95% do you mean that the piling and shoring work is 95% complete? yes and i completed up to 100%  by the same sequence, and thin the correction will be at the whole site.

With out this information I will say the following - A scale factor is used mostly in larger area or route surveys  - think a couple of kilometers or miles.  Once you get to a building layout condition revert back to a scale factor of 1.00000 - remember architects only think in square, level and plumb (I know..don't start)  I've never applied a scale factor to a building before. And I am only speaking about normal conditions - nothing like Burj Khalifa or Ping An towers.

( In accordance with US specifications, the Scale Factor should be eliminated in areas less than 250000 square meter, my project area 18500 m sq) and I know it is impossible to complete the building with Scale Factor, and this issue need to coordinate with the Arch. and Civil. 

On the tolerance vs. the size of the building, consider this - a 100.00 meter length must be established with a tolerance of +/- 7 cm or 0.07 meters (sorry the +/- 7 cm tolerance in pilling only not in the whole of building) . So your +/- or long and short for the 100 meters is 14 cm or 1 part in 1428. (the Scale Factor which used is 0.999666 which mean the variance in 100.00 m distance will be 0.0334 m)  Normal survey scale factors come into play in the 1 part in 10000 and higher ranges.  So your construction tolerances seems far greater ( read "looser" here ) than any survey related scale factor that you might have on your control points.

I offer you my sincere greetings and thank you for your patience in responding and for the excellent information you mentioned.
I met this problem and I liked to share it with all.
After i processed it I will mention here everything that has been done, and i like any advise from any one.

Mohamed

First of all, you don't need a scale factor in a building stake out because the architectural dimensions are as they are. If they used a gps in coordinating the controls , then a scale factor of 1-0.99 can be used in correcting distances, but not the building. Thank you.

Dear Kweku Danquah 

the Scale Factor which used in the project is 0.999666,  it is impossible to complete the building with Scale Factor, and i will correct and after correction i will raise what i did.

i appreciate you for  your reply 

Mohamed

More information would be nice but I think I understand your question with the info you have provided. Keep in mind that I am in the United States and therefore do not us the Metric System typically. That being said, I believe your question is in regards to the actual established survey control of the project. If there is a scale factor noted on the control sheet from the engineering plan set then I would imagine that the original design survey was done using GPS on a State Plane Coordinate System that was scaled to ground coordinates. When you get to the field and are occupying a control point you will need to use the published scale factor in order to check into your other control points. Once you have checked into the other control and everything is working as it should, the first thing I would do is shoot the existing piles and bolt patterns. If something isn’t right between the control you are using and the proposed design plans of the building you will see it then and there. If the pilings are positioned as they should be and your control is checking accurately, you should be good to go. Keep in mind that now that the pilings are laid out, they basically control more so than the project control points (so long as the civil engineer and the architect agree that they are ok with the position of the existing piling). Sorry if I haven’t helped or if you already knew everything I stated, I was trying to answer your questions without a complete understanding of the situation you are facing.

RSS

Where Thousands of Professional Land Surveyors, Students of Surveying and Educators are United through Collaborative Knowledge and Purpose.

Tools,Apps and Quick Guides

BMC logoSupport Us! +LandSurveyorsUnitedon Google+

Dedicated to the Memory of Skip Farrow (1953-2015)

+ Surveyor Sharer

Drag Button to bookmark bar and view submitted links here.Will soon be moved to a directory

AFGHANISTAN SURVEYORS ALBANIA SURVEYORS ALGERIA SURVEYORS AMERICAN SAMOA SURVEYORS ANDORRA SURVEYORS
ANGOLA SURVEYORS ANGUILLA SURVEYORS ANTIGUA & BARBUDA SURVEYORS ARGENTINA SURVEYORS ARMENIA SURVEYORS
ARUBA SURVEYORS AUSTRALIA SURVEYORS AUSTRIA SURVEYORS AZERBAIJAN SURVEYORS BAHAMAS SURVEYORS
BAHRAIN SURVEYORS BANGLADESH SURVEYORS BARBADOS SURVEYORS BELARUS SURVEYORS BELGIUM SURVEYORS
BELIZE SURVEYORS BENIN SURVEYORS BERMUDA SURVEYORS BHUTAN SURVEYORS BOLIVIA SURVEYORS
BOSNIA & HERZEGOWINA SURVEYORS BOTSWANA SURVEYORS BRAZIL SURVEYORS BRITISH INDIAN OCEAN TERRITORY SURVEYORS
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM SURVEYORS BULGARIA SURVEYORS BURKINA FASO SURVEYORS BURUNDI SURVEYORS CAMBODIA SURVEYORS
CAMEROON SURVEYORS CANADA SURVEYORS CAPE VERDE SURVEYORS CAYMAN ISLANDS SURVEYORS CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC SURVEYORS
CHAD SURVEYORS CHILE SURVEYORS CHINA SURVEYORS COLOMBIA SURVEYORS COMOROS SURVEYORS
CONGO SURVEYORS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO SURVEYORS COOK ISLANDS SURVEYORS COSTA RICA SURVEYORS COTE D'IVOIRE SURVEYORS
CROATIA SURVEYORS CUBA SURVEYORS CURACAO SURVEYORS CYPRUS SURVEYORS CZECH REPUBLIC SURVEYORS
DENMARK SURVEYORS DJIBOUTI SURVEYORS DOMINICA SURVEYORS DOMINICAN REPUBLIC SURVEYORS ECUADOR SURVEYORS
EGYPT SURVEYORS EL SALVADOR SURVEYORS EQUATORIAL GUINEA SURVEYORS ERITREA SURVEYORS ESTONIA SURVEYORS
ETHIOPIA SURVEYORS EUROPEAN UNION SURVEYORS FAROE ISLANDS SURVEYORS FIJI SURVEYORS FINLAND SURVEYORS
FRANCE SURVEYORS FRENCH GUIANA SURVEYORS FRENCH POLYNESIA SURVEYORS GABON SURVEYORS GAMBIA SURVEYORS
GEORGIA SURVEYORS GERMANY SURVEYORS GHANA SURVEYORS GIBRALTAR SURVEYORS GREECE SURVEYORS
GREENLAND SURVEYORS GRENADA SURVEYORS GUADELOUPE SURVEYORS GUAM SURVEYORS GUATEMALA SURVEYORS
GUERNSEY SURVEYORS GUINEA SURVEYORS GUINEA-BISSAU SURVEYORS GUYANA SURVEYORS HAITI SURVEYORS
HOLY SEE SURVEYORS HONDURAS SURVEYORS HONG KONG SURVEYORS HUNGARY SURVEYORS ICELAND SURVEYORS
INDIA SURVEYORS INDONESIA SURVEYORS IRAN SURVEYORS IRAQ SURVEYORS IRELAND SURVEYORS
ISLE OF MAN SURVEYORS ISRAEL SURVEYORS ITALY SURVEYORS JAMAICA SURVEYORS JAPAN SURVEYORS
JERSEY SURVEYORS JORDAN SURVEYORS KAZAKHSTAN SURVEYORS KENYA SURVEYORS KIRIBATI SURVEYORS
KOREA SURVEYORS KOREA REPUBLIC OF SURVEYORS KUWAIT SURVEYORS KYRGYZSTAN SURVEYORS LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC SURVEYORS
LATVIA SURVEYORS LEBANON SURVEYORS LESOTHO SURVEYORS LIBERIA SURVEYORS LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA SURVEYORS
LIECHTENSTEIN SURVEYORS LITHUANIA SURVEYORS LUXEMBOURG SURVEYORS MACAU SURVEYORS MACEDONIA SURVEYORS
MADAGASCAR SURVEYORS MALAWI SURVEYORS MALAYSIA SURVEYORS MALDIVES SURVEYORS MALI SURVEYORS
MALTA SURVEYORS MARSHALL ISLANDS SURVEYORS MARTINIQUE SURVEYORS MAURITANIA SURVEYORS MAURITIUS SURVEYORS
MAYOTTE SURVEYORS MEXICO SURVEYORS MICRONESIA SURVEYORS MOLDOVA SURVEYORS MONACO SURVEYORS
MONGOLIA SURVEYORS MONTENEGRO SURVEYORS MONTSERRAT SURVEYORS MOROCCO SURVEYORS MOZAMBIQUE SURVEYORS
MYANMAR SURVEYORS NAMIBIA SURVEYORS NAURU SURVEYORS NEPAL SURVEYORS NETHERLANDS SURVEYORS
NEW CALEDONIA SURVEYORS NEW ZEALAND SURVEYORS NICARAGUA SURVEYORS NIGER SURVEYORS NIGERIA SURVEYORS
NIUE SURVEYORS NON-SPEC ASIA PAS LOCATION SURVEYORS NORFOLK ISLAND SURVEYORS NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS SURVEYORS NORWAY SURVEYORS
OMAN SURVEYORS PAKISTAN SURVEYORS PALAU SURVEYORS PALESTINIAN TERRITORY OCCUPIED SURVEYORS PANAMA SURVEYORS
PAPUA NEW GUINEA SURVEYORS PARAGUAY SURVEYORS PERU SURVEYORS PHILIPPINES SURVEYORS POLAND SURVEYORS
PORTUGAL SURVEYORS PUERTO RICO SURVEYORS QATAR SURVEYORS RESERVED SURVEYORS REUNION SURVEYORS
ROMANIA SURVEYORS RUSSIAN FEDERATION SURVEYORS RWANDA SURVEYORS SAINT KITTS & NEVIS SURVEYORS SAINT LUCIA SURVEYORS
SAINT MARTIN SURVEYORS SAINT VINCENT & THE GRENADINES SURVEYORS SAMOA SURVEYORS SAN MARINO SURVEYORS SAO TOME & PRINCIPE SURVEYORS
SAUDI ARABIA SURVEYORS SENEGAL SURVEYORS SERBIA SURVEYORS SEYCHELLES SURVEYORS SIERRA LEONE SURVEYORS
SINGAPORE SURVEYORS SINT MAARTEN SURVEYORS SLOVAKIA (SLOVAK REPUBLIC) SURVEYORS SLOVENIA SURVEYORS SOLOMON ISLANDS SURVEYORS
SOMALIA SURVEYORS SOUTH AFRICA SURVEYORS SOUTH SUDAN SURVEYORS SPAIN SURVEYORS SRI LANKA SURVEYORS
ST. PIERRE AND MIQUELON SURVEYORS SUDAN SURVEYORS SURINAME SURVEYORS SWAZILAND SURVEYORS SWEDEN SURVEYORS
SWITZERLAND SURVEYORS SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC SURVEYORS TAIWAN; REPUBLIC OF CHINA (ROC) SURVEYORS TAJIKISTAN SURVEYORS TANZANIA UNITED REPUBLIC OF SURVEYORS
THAILAND SURVEYORS TIMOR-LESTE SURVEYORS TOGO SURVEYORS TOKELAU SURVEYORS TONGA SURVEYORS
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO SURVEYORS TUNISIA SURVEYORS TURKEY SURVEYORS TURKMENISTAN SURVEYORS TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS SURVEYORS
TUVALU SURVEYORS UGANDA SURVEYORS UKRAINE SURVEYORS UNITED ARAB EMIRATES SURVEYORS UNITED KINGDOM SURVEYORS
UNITED STATES SURVEYORS URUGUAY SURVEYORS UZBEKISTAN SURVEYORS VANUATU SURVEYORS VENEZUELA SURVEYORS
VIET NAM SURVEYORS VIRGIN ISLANDS (BRITISH) SURVEYORS VIRGIN ISLANDS (U.S.) SURVEYORS WALLIS AND FUTUNA ISLANDS SURVEYORS YEMEN SURVEYORS
ZAMBIA SURVEYORS ZIMBABWE SURVEYORS SURVEYORS

Location Based Surveying Practices

Land Surveyors United is the world's FIRST Global Social Network for geospatial professionals. We have dedicated, geolocated support groups for practically every country, continent and state on earth, for you to utilize for building your personal network. We are all essentially concerned with the same issues, no matter where we are located on earth. However, surveying practices and methods vary depending on the geographic location where we work. If you have noticed similarities and differences between the conditions, laws and practices between two or more areas of the world,discuss it in this forum. Build your reputation online by posting relevant discussions in your local group below.

Join and Introduce Yourself in Your Local Geosocial Forum:

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California
Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia
Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa
Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri
Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey
New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio
Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina
South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont
Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Not based in the US? Here are other groups for surveyors around the world to join and contribute knowledge and experiences as a land surveyor:

Africa Asia Australia Europe Russia Canada
Antarctica S.America N. America India Malaysia Caribbean

And more... Find your group forum based on location.

Choose Your Equipment Group Here

Handheld US Social Support for Land SurveyorsNIKON Social Support for Land SurveyorsTrimble Social Support for Land SurveyorsTopcon Social Support for Land SurveyorsSokkia Social Support for Land SurveyorsAshtech Social Support for Land SurveyorsNAVCOM Social Support for Land SurveyorsMagellan Social Support for Land SurveyorsLeica Social Support for Land SurveyorsAltus Positioning Social Support for Land SurveyorsMicroSurvey Social Support for Land SurveyorsJuniper Systems Social Support for Land SurveyorsTraverse PC Social Support for Land SurveyorsCarlson Software Social Support for Land Surveyors

what where  
job title, keywords or company
city, state or zip jobs by job search

PLEASE DONATE TODAY. Your generosity preserves surveying and mapping knowledge for future generations. Thank you.

Survey Equipment Troubles?

Geo Visitors Map

Choose Your Group Here

Surveying Equipment Support for Leica, Carlson, Sokkia, Trimble, Topcon, Altus, Nikon equipment


© 2018   © Created by Land Surveyors United   Powered by

Badges  |  Contact LSU  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service