I have an explanation for gps timing.  It seems to logically work as long as I do not consider doppler effects from a moving satellite.

Please help me fix my explanation so that I consider the signal distortion of the pulse train coming from the Satellite that is phase locked with the receiver pulse train.

gps%20explanation%2028%20feb%2017%200955.docx

Fundamental Methodology                               of Signal time of Flight

in GPS

 

I will attempt to explain GPS in a grossly simplified approach which lacks the details of the actual system but contains all essential features and hopefully clearly explains how time intervals and time are used.

Critical point # 1 Importance of time intervals

 

This explanation works if the effects of a moving satellite is neglected.  That factor will be addressed at the end.

 

Background:   “time intervals” and “time”

When talking about time in GPS,  one must differentiate between “time intervals” and “time”.

 

Time intervals (such as seconds in a clock) are not time.  An interval of time can be described by an event and wait period until the next event appears.   There is no summing of intervals.

 

Time is the summation of pulses (or intervals) from some agreed upon reference. 8 pm is 60 seconds after 7:59 pm. Or 7.2E4 seconds from midnight.  Or Y seconds from some reference years ago. The reference can be anything and is only important for the situation of interest.  The most important point to understand with time is that it is always focused on the summation of pulses.

 

GPS and time intervals

GPS is fundamentally based on a signal consisting of a sequence of pulses that are identical in pulse width and pulse period (time between pulses) both at the satellite and at the receiver.

 

Initially, when a receiver is turned on, the pulse train coming from the satellite and the pulse train from the receiver are independent. They approximately have the same pulse widths and frequency but are not in phase.

 

The pulse trains at the receiver are guaranteed to replicate the pulse trains from the satellite by using a phase lock loop(PLL) syncing methodology. Thus the two pulse sequences (one from the satellite and one at the ground station) appear to have the exact same frequency and the pulse trains are in phase.

 

If presented visually, one would see a satellite created pulse directly above and aligned(PLL) with a pulse created in the receiver.

 

But the satellite pulse directly above and aligned with the receiver pulse was made much earlier.

 

Satellite signals do not travel instantly. Signals are delayed x seconds for every y miles.

 

Keeping in mind that for the moment we are talking about a non-moving satellite for this explanation,  It does not matter that the satellite’s pulses may have been made earlier than the pulses created in the receiver. The pulse train proceeds without any impact on the signal pulse or its frequency (such as Doppler) until it finally arrives intact wherein the receiver pulse train is synchronized.

 

Looking for a time reference.

If one could magically, in a single reference time, identify one of the pulses at the satellite and one of the pulses at the receiver, then when the pulse from the satellite arrived at the receiver, the two marked pulses would be displaced from one another in integral pulse units which can be used to determine the flight time of the pulse from satellite to the receiver.  Knowing flight time AND the time the flight began(this number is only  involved in computing satellite position) enables distance to the known position of the satellite to be calculated. Note that the resolution of known distance is limited to the time interval between two adjacent pulses.

 

So the question is how does the magic occur in emulating a single reference time.

 

For the satellite to know reference time(defined on earth), it has to be accomplished by knowing exactly how far the satellite is from some known time reference on earth so that when it receives a “time stamp”  the distance is taken into consideration along with all kinds of second and third order effects. This is currently achieved by using a ground station that takes into consideration the delays in getting the reference time from a reference located on the globe to the ground station and then knows the distance from ground station to the satellite. It is a two step process but the two step process is able to better accommodate for all the factors that tend to degrade the transport of the reference time.

 

For the receiver it is not so easy to know reference time.  It can’t get it from the satellite as it does not know how far away the satellite is and the receiver does not know how far away it is from the earth reference time station.

Critical Point #2 Reference time for the receiver is derived, not given

It turns out that the receiver does not need to know a single reference time. The explanation based on a single reference time only enables people to appreciate that time of flight can be the basis for gps.

 

Instead, the receiver only needs to know that its location is at one and only one place. Sounds ridiculous, but this is how I believe it works:

 

The receiver guesses which of its pulses is the one that reference time would have selected. With that single guessed pulse, it concurrently guesses the receiver’s distances from at least four satellites and their known locations.

 

Any three distances define a location through trilateration. Thus having access to X satellites(equal to or greater than four) the receiver can calculate Y distances and as many locations, where Y is the number of combinations of X satellites taken 3 at a time (xC3)

The initial guess as to which pulse is the reference is likely to result in xC3  locations being predicted.

 

So the single guessed pulse is shifted to a new guess pulse resulting in a new calculated time of flight for each of the pulse trains from each of the satellites.  The xC3 time of flight guesses produces xC3 guessed distances and xC3 new guessed location.

 

Guesses continue to change  until all Y distances result in a single location being predicted.  Of course guessing is enhanced in several ways not of importance here.

 

Notice that the final guess of the reference pulse that results in a single location IS the delay that occurred when the reference pulse was issued from the satellite but the receiver did not need to know what that value was before it calculated the location of the receiver.

 

The reference time that is part of a message sent in the pulse train from the satellite is important but is not used in the time of flight calculation. Its importance is in allowing the receiver to look up a satellite location based on its unique id and the reference time sent with the pulse train. That satellite location is critical to the calculation of the distance between satellite and receiver.

Critical Point #3  Syncing of all satellites and ground stations

All of the Satellites can be synced to one Reference time as a fixed ground station knows about its delays getting the reference time from one part of the earth to its location  and the ground station knows the exact distance from the ground station to each satellite when it declares a Reference time. Syncing means the” marked” pulses I mentioned above are associated with the Reference time. Marked pulses in GPS terminology is actually a sequence of pulses called a Pseudorandom Noise Number (PRN), but knowing about PRN is not important here. Its primary function is to be a time marker and for an explanation, the time marker can be a single pulse.

 

Syncing also involves another process not relevant to the Reference time marker (PRN). While the pulse train of each satellite is very precise, there is nothing inherent with the atomic clock that guarantees the phase (leading edge of a pulse) of one atomic clock in one satellite will be in phase with another.

 

This is why the actual stream of pulses coming from each satellite is NOT the frequency of the  atomic clock. Each pulse streaming from a satellite consists of an integral number of atomic clock cycles. Typically the integral number is 5 but is unique for the multiple pulse streams GPS satellites transmit (ie L1 stream, L2 stream, L5 stream).

With the pulse width coming from the satellite to the receiver being an integral multiple of the atomic clock,,the manager of the GPS system is given the opportunity to shift the start of the  pulses streaming from each satellite with the resolution of one atomic clock cycle and yet retaining the pulse width in each of these pulse streams to within one atomic clock cycle.

Critical Point #4  Extraction of information from pulse streams

Satellites emit pulse streams at different frequencies. Thus there there is a pulse width assocated with L! specification, another with L2 specifications, etc.

What is important to grasp is that L1 from each satellite is the exact same frequency. So the interesting question is how does the receiver sort out which pulse belongs to which satellite.

That question is answered by the use of CDMA.

This Content Originally Published by a land surveyor to Land Surveyors United Network

Views: 271

See Your Saved Posts Timeline

☇ Reply to this

Replies to This Discussion

See if this helps.
See file to download below.
JAC
 

Download Survey Documents-Members Only
Was this resource helpful? Show your appreciation with a comment below. 

Donations are how we exist and grow for the surveying community worldwide.

Hi William, 

You can go to the site Science Daily and also get help or articles on any Science subject. you can also join the site and they will send you articles in your interest in RSS feed to your home page. But here are some links you might like also.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Timekeeping

section 8.3 time keeping

https://spectracom.com/resources/essential-education/gps-clock-sync...

https://www.pulseresearchlab.com/pages/gps-system-integration?gclid...

http://www.endruntechnologies.com/products.htm?gclid=COXwiqn2ytICFV...

There is a Electronic section in the  physical sciences & technology section great site for you.

 For electronic and anything in science.Hope you enjoy it.

https://www.sciencedaily.com

RSS

Where Thousands of Professional Land Surveyors, Students of Surveying and Educators are United through Collaborative Knowledge and Purpose.

Dedicated to the Memory of Skip Farrow (1953-2015)

+ Surveyor Sharer

Drag Button to bookmark bar and view submitted links here.Will soon be moved to a directory

AFGHANISTAN SURVEYORS ALBANIA SURVEYORS ALGERIA SURVEYORS AMERICAN SAMOA SURVEYORS ANDORRA SURVEYORS
ANGOLA SURVEYORS ANGUILLA SURVEYORS ANTIGUA & BARBUDA SURVEYORS ARGENTINA SURVEYORS ARMENIA SURVEYORS
ARUBA SURVEYORS AUSTRALIA SURVEYORS AUSTRIA SURVEYORS AZERBAIJAN SURVEYORS BAHAMAS SURVEYORS
BAHRAIN SURVEYORS BANGLADESH SURVEYORS BARBADOS SURVEYORS BELARUS SURVEYORS BELGIUM SURVEYORS
BELIZE SURVEYORS BENIN SURVEYORS BERMUDA SURVEYORS BHUTAN SURVEYORS BOLIVIA SURVEYORS
BOSNIA & HERZEGOWINA SURVEYORS BOTSWANA SURVEYORS BRAZIL SURVEYORS BRITISH INDIAN OCEAN TERRITORY SURVEYORS
BRUNEI DARUSSALAM SURVEYORS BULGARIA SURVEYORS BURKINA FASO SURVEYORS BURUNDI SURVEYORS CAMBODIA SURVEYORS
CAMEROON SURVEYORS CANADA SURVEYORS CAPE VERDE SURVEYORS CAYMAN ISLANDS SURVEYORS CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC SURVEYORS
CHAD SURVEYORS CHILE SURVEYORS CHINA SURVEYORS COLOMBIA SURVEYORS COMOROS SURVEYORS
CONGO SURVEYORS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO SURVEYORS COOK ISLANDS SURVEYORS COSTA RICA SURVEYORS COTE D'IVOIRE SURVEYORS
CROATIA SURVEYORS CUBA SURVEYORS CURACAO SURVEYORS CYPRUS SURVEYORS CZECH REPUBLIC SURVEYORS
DENMARK SURVEYORS DJIBOUTI SURVEYORS DOMINICA SURVEYORS DOMINICAN REPUBLIC SURVEYORS ECUADOR SURVEYORS
EGYPT SURVEYORS EL SALVADOR SURVEYORS EQUATORIAL GUINEA SURVEYORS ERITREA SURVEYORS ESTONIA SURVEYORS
ETHIOPIA SURVEYORS EUROPEAN UNION SURVEYORS FAROE ISLANDS SURVEYORS FIJI SURVEYORS FINLAND SURVEYORS
FRANCE SURVEYORS FRENCH GUIANA SURVEYORS FRENCH POLYNESIA SURVEYORS GABON SURVEYORS GAMBIA SURVEYORS
GEORGIA SURVEYORS GERMANY SURVEYORS GHANA SURVEYORS GIBRALTAR SURVEYORS GREECE SURVEYORS
GREENLAND SURVEYORS GRENADA SURVEYORS GUADELOUPE SURVEYORS GUAM SURVEYORS GUATEMALA SURVEYORS
GUERNSEY SURVEYORS GUINEA SURVEYORS GUINEA-BISSAU SURVEYORS GUYANA SURVEYORS HAITI SURVEYORS
HOLY SEE SURVEYORS HONDURAS SURVEYORS HONG KONG SURVEYORS HUNGARY SURVEYORS ICELAND SURVEYORS
INDIA SURVEYORS INDONESIA SURVEYORS IRAN SURVEYORS IRAQ SURVEYORS IRELAND SURVEYORS
ISLE OF MAN SURVEYORS ISRAEL SURVEYORS ITALY SURVEYORS JAMAICA SURVEYORS JAPAN SURVEYORS
JERSEY SURVEYORS JORDAN SURVEYORS KAZAKHSTAN SURVEYORS KENYA SURVEYORS KIRIBATI SURVEYORS
KOREA SURVEYORS KOREA REPUBLIC OF SURVEYORS KUWAIT SURVEYORS KYRGYZSTAN SURVEYORS LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC SURVEYORS
LATVIA SURVEYORS LEBANON SURVEYORS LESOTHO SURVEYORS LIBERIA SURVEYORS LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA SURVEYORS
LIECHTENSTEIN SURVEYORS LITHUANIA SURVEYORS LUXEMBOURG SURVEYORS MACAU SURVEYORS MACEDONIA SURVEYORS
MADAGASCAR SURVEYORS MALAWI SURVEYORS MALAYSIA SURVEYORS MALDIVES SURVEYORS MALI SURVEYORS
MALTA SURVEYORS MARSHALL ISLANDS SURVEYORS MARTINIQUE SURVEYORS MAURITANIA SURVEYORS MAURITIUS SURVEYORS
MAYOTTE SURVEYORS MEXICO SURVEYORS MICRONESIA SURVEYORS MOLDOVA SURVEYORS MONACO SURVEYORS
MONGOLIA SURVEYORS MONTENEGRO SURVEYORS MONTSERRAT SURVEYORS MOROCCO SURVEYORS MOZAMBIQUE SURVEYORS
MYANMAR SURVEYORS NAMIBIA SURVEYORS NAURU SURVEYORS NEPAL SURVEYORS NETHERLANDS SURVEYORS
NEW CALEDONIA SURVEYORS NEW ZEALAND SURVEYORS NICARAGUA SURVEYORS NIGER SURVEYORS NIGERIA SURVEYORS
NIUE SURVEYORS NON-SPEC ASIA PAS LOCATION SURVEYORS NORFOLK ISLAND SURVEYORS NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS SURVEYORS NORWAY SURVEYORS
OMAN SURVEYORS PAKISTAN SURVEYORS PALAU SURVEYORS PALESTINIAN TERRITORY OCCUPIED SURVEYORS PANAMA SURVEYORS
PAPUA NEW GUINEA SURVEYORS PARAGUAY SURVEYORS PERU SURVEYORS PHILIPPINES SURVEYORS POLAND SURVEYORS
PORTUGAL SURVEYORS PUERTO RICO SURVEYORS QATAR SURVEYORS RESERVED SURVEYORS REUNION SURVEYORS
ROMANIA SURVEYORS RUSSIAN FEDERATION SURVEYORS RWANDA SURVEYORS SAINT KITTS & NEVIS SURVEYORS SAINT LUCIA SURVEYORS
SAINT MARTIN SURVEYORS SAINT VINCENT & THE GRENADINES SURVEYORS SAMOA SURVEYORS SAN MARINO SURVEYORS SAO TOME & PRINCIPE SURVEYORS
SAUDI ARABIA SURVEYORS SENEGAL SURVEYORS SERBIA SURVEYORS SEYCHELLES SURVEYORS SIERRA LEONE SURVEYORS
SINGAPORE SURVEYORS SINT MAARTEN SURVEYORS SLOVAKIA (SLOVAK REPUBLIC) SURVEYORS SLOVENIA SURVEYORS SOLOMON ISLANDS SURVEYORS
SOMALIA SURVEYORS SOUTH AFRICA SURVEYORS SOUTH SUDAN SURVEYORS SPAIN SURVEYORS SRI LANKA SURVEYORS
ST. PIERRE AND MIQUELON SURVEYORS SUDAN SURVEYORS SURINAME SURVEYORS SWAZILAND SURVEYORS SWEDEN SURVEYORS
SWITZERLAND SURVEYORS SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC SURVEYORS TAIWAN; REPUBLIC OF CHINA (ROC) SURVEYORS TAJIKISTAN SURVEYORS TANZANIA UNITED REPUBLIC OF SURVEYORS
THAILAND SURVEYORS TIMOR-LESTE SURVEYORS TOGO SURVEYORS TOKELAU SURVEYORS TONGA SURVEYORS
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO SURVEYORS TUNISIA SURVEYORS TURKEY SURVEYORS TURKMENISTAN SURVEYORS TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS SURVEYORS
TUVALU SURVEYORS UGANDA SURVEYORS UKRAINE SURVEYORS UNITED ARAB EMIRATES SURVEYORS UNITED KINGDOM SURVEYORS
UNITED STATES SURVEYORS URUGUAY SURVEYORS UZBEKISTAN SURVEYORS VANUATU SURVEYORS VENEZUELA SURVEYORS
VIET NAM SURVEYORS VIRGIN ISLANDS (BRITISH) SURVEYORS VIRGIN ISLANDS (U.S.) SURVEYORS WALLIS AND FUTUNA ISLANDS SURVEYORS YEMEN SURVEYORS
ZAMBIA SURVEYORS ZIMBABWE SURVEYORS SURVEYORS

Location Based Surveying Practices

Land Surveyors United is the world's FIRST Global Social Network for geospatial professionals. We have dedicated, geolocated support groups for practically every country, continent and state on earth, for you to utilize for building your personal network. We are all essentially concerned with the same issues, no matter where we are located on earth. However, surveying practices and methods vary depending on the geographic location where we work. If you have noticed similarities and differences between the conditions, laws and practices between two or more areas of the world,discuss it in this forum. Build your reputation online by posting relevant discussions in your local group below.

Join and Introduce Yourself in Your Local Geosocial Forum:

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California
Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia
Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa
Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri
Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey
New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio
Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina
South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont
Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Not based in the US? Here are other groups for surveyors around the world to join and contribute knowledge and experiences as a land surveyor:

Africa Asia Australia Europe Russia Canada
Antarctica S.America N. America India Malaysia Caribbean

And more... Find your group forum based on location.

Choose Your Equipment Group Here

Handheld US Social Support for Land SurveyorsNIKON Social Support for Land SurveyorsTrimble Social Support for Land SurveyorsTopcon Social Support for Land SurveyorsSokkia Social Support for Land SurveyorsAshtech Social Support for Land SurveyorsNAVCOM Social Support for Land SurveyorsMagellan Social Support for Land SurveyorsLeica Social Support for Land SurveyorsAltus Positioning Social Support for Land SurveyorsMicroSurvey Social Support for Land SurveyorsJuniper Systems Social Support for Land SurveyorsTraverse PC Social Support for Land SurveyorsCarlson Software Social Support for Land Surveyors

what where  
job title, keywords or company
city, state or zip jobs by job search

PLEASE DONATE TODAY. Your generosity preserves surveying and mapping knowledge for future generations. Thank you.

Survey Equipment Troubles?

Geo Visitors Map

Choose Your Group Here

Surveying Equipment Support for Leica, Carlson, Sokkia, Trimble, Topcon, Altus, Nikon equipment


Surveyor Birthdays

Surveyor Birthdays Today

Surveyor Birthdays Tomorrow

© 2017   © Created by Land Surveyors United   Powered by

Badges  |  Contact LSU  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service

Live Support